CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024
Electroacupuncture ameliorates neuroinflammation by inhibiting TRPV4 channel in ischemic stroke.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ren Xueqi, Gao Xinyi, Li Ziqing, Ding Yangyang, Xu Ao, Du Lixia, Yang Yufang, Wang Deheng, Wang Zhifei, Shu Shi
Аннотация
AIMS: We investigated the potential mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) at the Shuigou (GV26) and Baihui (GV20) acupoints in the treatment of ischemic stroke.
METHODS: We assessed the therapeutic effects of EA on MCAO mice through behavioral studies and TTC staining. Various techniques, such as RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and Western blots, were employed to evaluate the activation and polarization of microglia/macrophages, and changes in the TRPV4 ion channel. We used the TRPV4 antagonist GSK2193874 (GSK219) to verify the involvement of TRPV4 in the therapeutic effects of EA.
RESULTS: EA effectively improved neurological impairments and reduced cerebral infarction volume in MCAO mice. It suppressed activated microglia/macrophages and inhibited their polarization toward the M1 phenotype post-MCAO. EA also downregulated the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including Tnf-α, Il-6, Il-1β, and Ccl-2 mRNA. Furthermore, EA reduced the elevated expression of TRPV4 following MCAO. Treatment with the TRPV4 antagonist GSK219 mirrored the effects of EA in MCAO mice. Notably, the combination of EA and GSK219 did not demonstrate an additive or synergistic effect.
CONCLUSION: EA may inhibit neuroinflammation and exhibit a protective effect against ischemic brain injury by suppressing TRPV4 and the subsequent M1 polarization of microglia/macrophages.
METHODS: We assessed the therapeutic effects of EA on MCAO mice through behavioral studies and TTC staining. Various techniques, such as RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and Western blots, were employed to evaluate the activation and polarization of microglia/macrophages, and changes in the TRPV4 ion channel. We used the TRPV4 antagonist GSK2193874 (GSK219) to verify the involvement of TRPV4 in the therapeutic effects of EA.
RESULTS: EA effectively improved neurological impairments and reduced cerebral infarction volume in MCAO mice. It suppressed activated microglia/macrophages and inhibited their polarization toward the M1 phenotype post-MCAO. EA also downregulated the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including Tnf-α, Il-6, Il-1β, and Ccl-2 mRNA. Furthermore, EA reduced the elevated expression of TRPV4 following MCAO. Treatment with the TRPV4 antagonist GSK219 mirrored the effects of EA in MCAO mice. Notably, the combination of EA and GSK219 did not demonstrate an additive or synergistic effect.
CONCLUSION: EA may inhibit neuroinflammation and exhibit a protective effect against ischemic brain injury by suppressing TRPV4 and the subsequent M1 polarization of microglia/macrophages.