A cortically-weighted versus total Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in thrombectomy outcome models.

OBJECTIVES

Individual subcortical infarct scoring for the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) can be difficult and is subjected to higher inter-reader variability. This study compares performance of the 10-point ASPECTS with a new 7-point cortically-weighted score in predicting post-thrombectomy functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Prospective registry data from two comprehensive stroke centers (Site 1 2016-2021; Site 2: 2019-2021) included patients with either M1 segment of middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery occlusions who underwent thrombectomy. Two multivariate proportional odds training models utilizing either 10-point or 7-point ASPECTS predicting 90-day shift in modified Rankin score were generated using Site 1 data and validated with Site 2 data. Models were compared using multiclass receiver operator characteristics, corrected Akaike's Information Criterion, and likelihood ratio test.

RESULTS

Of 328 patients (Site 1 = 181, Site 2 = 147), median age was 71y (IQR 61-82), 119 (36%) had internal carotid artery occlusions, and median 10-point ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 8-10). There was no difference in performance between models using either total or cortically-weighted ASPECTS (p=0.14). Validation cohort data were correctly (i.e., predicting modified Rankin score within one point) classified 50% (cortically-weighted score model) and 56% (total score model) of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-point cortically-weighted ASPECTS was similarly predictive of post-thrombectomy functional outcome as 10-point ASPECTS. Given noninferior performance, the cortically-weighted score is a potentially reliable, but simplified, alternative to the traditional scoring paradigm, with potential implications in automated image analysis tool development.