Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025
Intermediate catheter use is associated with complete occlusion and dense packing in coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a propensity score matched study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fuga Michiyasu, Ishibashi Toshihiro, Aoki Ken, Tachi Rintaro, Irie Koreaki, Kato Naoki, Kan Issei, Hataoka Shunsuke, Nagayama Gota, Sano Tohru, Tanaka Toshihide, Murayama Yuichi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An intermediate catheter (IMC) can improve the maneuverability and stability of the microcatheter.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of using an IMC in triaxial systems for coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCAs).
METHODS: A total of 2430 consecutive saccular UCAs (2259 patients) that underwent initial coil embolization at three institutions between November 2003 and May 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into two groups: with IMC (IMC(+)) and without IMC (IMC(-)). To investigate whether IMC use increased the rate of complete occlusion and the packing density, a propensity score-matched analysis was used to control for clinical, anatomical, and procedural features.
RESULTS: Ultimately, 595 (24.5%) coil embolization used an IMC. Propensity score matching was successful for 424 paired IMC(+) and IMC(-) aneurysms. Compared with the IMC(-) group, the IMC(+) group had significantly higher rate of Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification class 1 immediately after treatment (30.0% vs 20.8%, P=0.003) and at 6 months (28.8% vs 20.0%, P=0.004) and a higher volume embolization ratio (27.2% (SD 6.5%) vs 25.9% (SD 6.2%), P=0.003). Re-treatment rates were not significantly different between the two groups (0.7% vs 0.2%, P=0.624). No significant differences in the incidences of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications and IMC-related parent artery dissection were found between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Use of IMCs in triaxial systems can provide effective and safe support in coil embolization of UCAs because complete occlusion and dense coil packing can be achieved without increased complications.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of using an IMC in triaxial systems for coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCAs).
METHODS: A total of 2430 consecutive saccular UCAs (2259 patients) that underwent initial coil embolization at three institutions between November 2003 and May 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into two groups: with IMC (IMC(+)) and without IMC (IMC(-)). To investigate whether IMC use increased the rate of complete occlusion and the packing density, a propensity score-matched analysis was used to control for clinical, anatomical, and procedural features.
RESULTS: Ultimately, 595 (24.5%) coil embolization used an IMC. Propensity score matching was successful for 424 paired IMC(+) and IMC(-) aneurysms. Compared with the IMC(-) group, the IMC(+) group had significantly higher rate of Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification class 1 immediately after treatment (30.0% vs 20.8%, P=0.003) and at 6 months (28.8% vs 20.0%, P=0.004) and a higher volume embolization ratio (27.2% (SD 6.5%) vs 25.9% (SD 6.2%), P=0.003). Re-treatment rates were not significantly different between the two groups (0.7% vs 0.2%, P=0.624). No significant differences in the incidences of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications and IMC-related parent artery dissection were found between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Use of IMCs in triaxial systems can provide effective and safe support in coil embolization of UCAs because complete occlusion and dense coil packing can be achieved without increased complications.