Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology · 2017
[A retrospective study on incisor root resorption in patients treated with bracketless invisible appliance and straight wire appliance].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Guan, Yang Lu, Zhang Yu-Feng, Luo San-Lian, Zheng Ji-Wei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess root resorptions in patients treated with bracketless invisible appliance and straight wire appliance using cone-beam CT (CBCT).
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients treated with bracketless invisible appliance (as experimental group) or straight wire appliance (as control group) were randomly selected. CBCT images were analyzed at 3 time points (pre-operation, 6 month after operation, post-operation). Root resorption was calculated using root length at 3 time points. The difference between the 2 groups was analyzed with SPSS16.0 software package. To those teeth with no root length reduction, the bone defect was evaluated using CBCT.
RESULTS: After 6-month of treatment, 47.3% teeth from the experimental group had root resorption, while 68.3% in the control group. There was significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.05). Root absorption of maxillary central incisors from the 2 groups was more severe than other teeth (55% in the experimental group, and 75% in the control group). After orthodontic treatment, the incidence of root resorption in the control groups increased to be 85.3% and 68.3% in the experimental group (P<0.05). To those teeth with no root resorption, bone defect was more common in the palatal side (18% in the experimental group, 14% in the control group).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with straight wire appliance, patients using bracketless invisible appliance suffer from less root resorption.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients treated with bracketless invisible appliance (as experimental group) or straight wire appliance (as control group) were randomly selected. CBCT images were analyzed at 3 time points (pre-operation, 6 month after operation, post-operation). Root resorption was calculated using root length at 3 time points. The difference between the 2 groups was analyzed with SPSS16.0 software package. To those teeth with no root length reduction, the bone defect was evaluated using CBCT.
RESULTS: After 6-month of treatment, 47.3% teeth from the experimental group had root resorption, while 68.3% in the control group. There was significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.05). Root absorption of maxillary central incisors from the 2 groups was more severe than other teeth (55% in the experimental group, and 75% in the control group). After orthodontic treatment, the incidence of root resorption in the control groups increased to be 85.3% and 68.3% in the experimental group (P<0.05). To those teeth with no root resorption, bone defect was more common in the palatal side (18% in the experimental group, 14% in the control group).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with straight wire appliance, patients using bracketless invisible appliance suffer from less root resorption.