Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization.

BACKGROUND

Here we report the short- and long-term results of a minimally invasive hybrid approach in 117 patients.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2007, revascularization of the left anterior descending artery was performed in 1,696 patients by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), in 89 patients by beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) and in 30 patients by arrested-heart TECAB. Of these patients, 117 were scheduled for a hybrid procedure. Revascularization of the left anterior descending artery was performed by either MIDCAB (107 patients), beating-heart TECAB (8 patients) or arrested-heart TECAB (2 patients). Percutaneous coronary intervention of vessels other than the left anterior descending artery was performed 4 to 6 weeks preoperatively (53 cases), intraoperatively (5 cases), or 2 to 45 days postoperatively (59 cases). Demographic data, perioperative outcome, and annual follow-up were obtained from all patients.

RESULTS

Minimally invasive bypass and stenting could be completed in all patients. Two high-risk patients (1.9%) died postoperatively. Follow-up of all patients adds up to 208 patient-years. Eight patients died during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival was 92.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.5% to 98.4%) at 1 year and 84.8% (95% CI: 73.5% to 94.9%) at 5 years. Follow-up angiogram of symptomatic patients showed 1 bypass occlusion and 5 in-stent restenosis with need for reintervention. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (including reintervention) and angina was 85.5% (95% CI: 76.9% to 94.1%) at 1 year and 75.5% (95% CI: 62.7% to 87.3%) at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive hybrid coronary revascularization is a safe approach with good long-term results. It should be performed in selected patients at centers with considerable experience in minimally invasive bypass surgery and requires close cooperation between cardiologists and surgeons.