MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.008

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2017

Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hoshijima Hiroshi, Denawa Yohei, Tominaga Asako, Nakamura China, Shiga Toshiya, Nagasaka Hiroshi

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

Videolaryngoscopy has become more common since the 2000s. Despite several anecdotal reports in the literature, it remains unclear whether videolaryngoscopy is superior to direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on prospective randomised trials comparing videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity.

DESIGN

Systematic review, Meta-analysis

SETTING

Operating room, Obesity patients MEASUREMENTS: Data on success rate, intubation time, and glottic visualisation during tracheal intubation were extracted from the identified studies. In a subgroup analysis, we also compared the parameters for videolaryngoscopes with a tracheal tube guide channel and those without a tracheal tube guide channel. Data from individual trials were combined, and the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model was used to calculate either the pooled relative risk (RR) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN

RESULTS

Eleven articles describing 13 trials met the inclusion criteria. The performance of videolaryngoscopes was superior to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope for all outcomes. (Success rate; RR=1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.18, p=0.001, I2=63%, Intubation time; WMD=-16.1, 95% CI -31.1 to -1.10, p=0.04, I2=97%, Glottic visualisation; RR=1.19, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.30, p<0.0001, I2=76%) In the subgroup analysis, the performance of both types of videolaryngoscopes (with and without a tracheal tube guide channel) was superior to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope, except for intubation time with the videolaryngoscopes without a tracheal tube guide channel.

CONCLUSIONS

Videolaryngoscopes were superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity. (GRADE score: low or very low.).

Для цитирования: Hoshijima Hiroshi, Denawa Yohei, Tominaga Asako, Nakamura China, Shiga Toshiya, Nagasaka Hiroshi. Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.