Primary and salvage laser surgery of 341 glottic cancers-Comparison of treatment outcomes between University Head Neck Tertiary Referral Center and Local Head Neck Department.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The main goal was to compare the clinical data of patients with T1 and T2 glottic cancer treated with CO2 transoral laser microlaryngoscopy (TLM) in the Tertiary Referral University Department of Otolaryngology, Head Neck Surgery, Poznan and the local Department of Otolaryngology, Oncology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bydgoszcz.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Unified databases for the 7-year period January 2005-December 2011 were created to compare these two cohorts. The database contained 341 patients: 231 from the tertiary center and 110 from the local department, of which 298 (87%) were men, and 43 (13%) were women.
RESULTS
Cordectomy type I-IV was performed in 250 (73%) patients, cordectomy type V-VI in 84 (25%) patients, and cordectomy enlarged to epiglottic petiole in 7 (2%) patients. Local recurrence was observed in 96 (28%) cases. Among these cases, 81 (87.5%) patients had salvage surgery: 43 re-cordectomy, 10 open partial laryngectomy, and 28 total laryngectomy. The outcomes for the whole cohort, Tertiary Referral Center and Local Department respectively were as follows: larynx preservation rate was 91.8%, 93.6%, and 88%; 3-year disease specific survival was 97.4%, 97.9%, and 93.3%; 3-year overall survival was 93.5%, 96.6%, and 85.5%; 5-year disease specific survival was 95.2%, 95.2%, and 96.3%; and 5-year overall survival was 84.5%, 88.7%, and 76%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Comparison of the cohorts showed that outcomes of primary treatment were similar but there were noticeable differences in salvage treatment efficacy, favoring patients from the Tertiary Referral Center. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:311-318, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.