MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.036

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of emergency medicine · 2017

Airway Management in an Infant with a Large Supraglottic Mass after Failed Fiberoptic Intubation.

Sharma Rajeev, Kaushal Vidit, Tyagi Mohit, Mittal Ashish

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation is the gold standard for managing patients with supraglottic growths. In infants with a large and overhanging epiglottis, the success of fiberoptic-guided intubation relies heavily on the available space between the inferior surface of the epiglottis and the posterior pharyngeal wall or, more specifically, the superior surface of the supraglottic growth.

CASE REPORT: We describe the inability to negotiate the tip of the fiberscope between the epiglottis and the supraglottic growth and the successful use of direct laryngoscopy to improve the available space along with the usefulness of "bubbling of air" to locate the glottic opening in an infant. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: We emphasize the role of the emergency physician in managing such patients. Most of the time, the setting is not ideal in such emergency situations and the most qualified clinician to treat them is the emergency physician. The knowledge and skills of the emergency physician, along with awareness of the possible techniques for airway management, can be lifesaving.

Для цитирования: Sharma Rajeev, Kaushal Vidit, Tyagi Mohit, Mittal Ashish. Airway Management in an Infant with a Large Supraglottic Mass after Failed Fiberoptic Intubation.. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.036.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.