MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.24723

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2017

T1 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis with anterior commissure involvement: Radiotherapy versus transoral laser microsurgery.

Alkan Uri, Nachalon Yuval, Shkedy Yotam, Yaniv Dan, Shvero Jacob, Popovtzer Aron

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment method of T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with involvement of the anterior commissure is still debatable. We compared the outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM).

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected for 54 patients who were treated by RT (n = 38) or TLM (n = 16) from 2006 to 2013.

RESULTS

No between-group differences were found in demographic or risk factors. Recurrence was noted in 6 patients of the TLM group and 5 of the RT group. There was a near-significant association of TLM with recurrence (p = .053). Radiation was associated with a higher 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (87.3% vs 74.9%; p = .037). Both groups had excellent rates for local control (75% and 97%, respectively), and overall survival (78.9 and 87.5%, respectively). There were no significant differences in outcome parameters by tumor classification.

CONCLUSION

TLM is associated with higher recurrence rates and lower DFS. Both patients with T1a and T1b disease had the same outcome parameters. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1101-1105, 2017.

Для цитирования: Alkan Uri, Nachalon Yuval, Shkedy Yotam, Yaniv Dan, Shvero Jacob, Popovtzer Aron. T1 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis with anterior commissure involvement: Radiotherapy versus transoral laser microsurgery.. Head & neck. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24723.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.