Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 2004
Villous tip intraepithelial lymphocytes as markers of early-stage coeliac disease.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Järvinen T T, Collin P, Rasmussen M, Kyrönpalo S, Mäki M, Partanen J, Reunala T, Kaukinen K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An investigation was conducted to determine whether the density of small-intestinal villous tip intraepithelial lymphocytes would be of value in clinical practice in uncovering early-stage coeliac disease.
METHODS: Villous tip, CD3+ and gammadelta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes were counted in patients with definite early-stage coeliac disease without villous atrophy, in classic coeliac disease with manifest mucosal lesion and in non-coeliac controls with normal mucosal structure. Villous tip analysis was made of haematoxylin-eosin specimens and CD3+ and gammadelta+ of immunohistochemical stainings from frozen samples.
RESULTS: The villous tip intraepithelial lymphocyte count was statistically significantly higher in patients with early-stage coeliac disease than in non-coeliac controls. The sensitivity of this method to detect untreated coeliac disease with normal villous architecture was 0.84; the specificity was 0.88. This method proved superior to CD3+ analysis and was at least as good as gammadelta+ analysis in detecting early-stage coeliac disease. In detecting classic coeliac disease, villous tip analysis also reached a higher sensitivity than CD3+ and gammadelta+ cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Villous tip analysis seems to distinguish early coeliac from non-specific changes, thus providing a valuable tool in routine practice, especially when borderline findings are involved. Its value appears to be similar to counting of gammadelta+ cells, which, however, requires frozen biopsy samples.
METHODS: Villous tip, CD3+ and gammadelta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes were counted in patients with definite early-stage coeliac disease without villous atrophy, in classic coeliac disease with manifest mucosal lesion and in non-coeliac controls with normal mucosal structure. Villous tip analysis was made of haematoxylin-eosin specimens and CD3+ and gammadelta+ of immunohistochemical stainings from frozen samples.
RESULTS: The villous tip intraepithelial lymphocyte count was statistically significantly higher in patients with early-stage coeliac disease than in non-coeliac controls. The sensitivity of this method to detect untreated coeliac disease with normal villous architecture was 0.84; the specificity was 0.88. This method proved superior to CD3+ analysis and was at least as good as gammadelta+ analysis in detecting early-stage coeliac disease. In detecting classic coeliac disease, villous tip analysis also reached a higher sensitivity than CD3+ and gammadelta+ cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Villous tip analysis seems to distinguish early coeliac from non-specific changes, thus providing a valuable tool in routine practice, especially when borderline findings are involved. Its value appears to be similar to counting of gammadelta+ cells, which, however, requires frozen biopsy samples.