MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1533317517722630

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2017

The TMA-93: A New Memory Test for Alzheimer's Disease in Illiterate and Less Educated People.

Maillet Didier, Narme Pauline, Amieva Hélène, Matharan Fanny, Bailon Olivier, Le Clésiau Hervé, Belin Catherine

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The present study aimed at validating the Memory Associative Test of the district of Seine-Saint-Denis (TMA)-93, a new test of episodic memory. The TMA-93 was proposed to mostly less educated and multicultural elderly population composed of 376 healthy controls (HC) and 94 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The construct validity was checked by studying correlations with a widely used memory test (the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test [FCSRT]) in the subsample of literate patients. Results showed that (i) all the TMA-93 scores of the patients with AD were lower than those of the HC, (ii) the TMA-93 total score identified patients with AD with a high sensitivity (88%) and very high specificity (97%), and (iii) the TMA-93 total score was strongly correlated with both free recall and total recall scores of the FCSRT. Taken together, results showed that the TMA-93 is a reliable tool to assess episodic memory in a multicultural, less educated, or illiterate population, with good construct validity for AD diagnostic accuracy.

Для цитирования: Maillet Didier, Narme Pauline, Amieva Hélène, Matharan Fanny, Bailon Olivier, Le Clésiau Hervé, Belin Catherine. The TMA-93: A New Memory Test for Alzheimer's Disease in Illiterate and Less Educated People.. American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1533317517722630.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.