MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90086-r

Медицинская библиотека · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 1992

Kala-azar: a comparative study of parasitological methods and the direct agglutination test in diagnosis.

Zijlstra E E, Ali M S, el-Hassan A M, el-Toum I A, Satti M, Ghalib H W, Kager P A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In a comparative study 88 patients were diagnosed as suffering from kala-azar (visceral leishmaniasis) using 3 parasitological methods simultaneously. Splenomegaly was absent in 4 cases. In 84 patients with splenomegaly, splenic aspiration appeared to be the most sensitive method (96.4%), followed by bone marrow aspiration (70.2%) and lymph node aspiration (58.3%). There was no relation between titres in the direct agglutination test and parasite load as determined by the number of parasitological methods which were positive or parasite density in splenic aspirates. Splenic aspiration and bone marrow aspiration were compared as an assessment of cure in kala-azar. In 6 (13%) of 46 patients tested, parasites were found, all by splenic aspiration. Bone marrow showed parasites in one of these. The literature with regard to parasitological investigations before and after treatment is reviewed.

Для цитирования: Zijlstra E E, Ali M S, el-Hassan A M, el-Toum I A, Satti M, Ghalib H W, Kager P A. Kala-azar: a comparative study of parasitological methods and the direct agglutination test in diagnosis.. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90086-r.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.