MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/cre/abuag011

Медицинская библиотека · Caries research · 2026

Does detection of active initial caries lesions in primary teeth improve clinical outcomes? CARDEC-02 randomized controlled trial of diagnostic-treatment strategies guided by different caries thresholds.

Braga Mariana Minatel, Floriano Isabela, Freitas Raiza Dias, Rocha Elizabeth Souza, Tedesco Tamara Kerber, Machado Gabriela Manco, Gomes Renata Antonangelo, Machado Thais Gomes, Pontes Laura Regina Antunes, Imparato José Carlos Pettorossi, Raggio Daniela Prócida, Mendes Fausto Medeiros

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Early detection of caries lesions has been encouraged to prevent their progression. However, because the progression rate is relatively low, detecting initial lesions in the caries diagnosis strategy may be considered overdiagnosis, since one can expend additional unnecessary treatment with no relevant benefits for children. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact on children's clinical outcomes of guiding dental treatment based on detecting active initial caries lesions versus ignoring initial caries lesions when assessing dental surfaces in primary teeth.

METHODS

A randomized controlled diagnostic-treatment trial was designed with 3- to 6-year-old participants and a 2-year follow-up. Caries management interventions were defined based on two different diagnostic thresholds (diagnostic-treatment strategies) considering all caries lesions (including active initial caries) (ALL) or only advanced lesions (ADV). The primary outcome was the number of surfaces needing new operative interventions after two years. Secondary outcomes comprised the type of treatment performed at baseline, the number of new caries lesions after follow-up, the need for restoration replacement, endodontic treatment, or tooth extraction, and oral-health-related quality of life and parental satisfaction with the treatment. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted, and negative binomial regression was used for comparisons.

RESULTS

Of the 260 participants included, 222 were followed up (14.6% attrition rate). No difference was observed between groups for the primary outcome (p=0.827). For the secondary outcomes, children allocated to the ALL group had more non-operative procedures and a higher number of sessions with professional fluoride application. For other secondary outcomes, the groups did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Detecting active initial caries lesions and guiding dental treatment focused on these lesions does not decrease the new operative interventions in primary teeth compared to when these initial lesions are ignored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02473107. Registered June 16, 2015.

Для цитирования: Braga Mariana Minatel, Floriano Isabela, Freitas Raiza Dias, Rocha Elizabeth Souza, Tedesco Tamara Kerber, Machado Gabriela Manco, Gomes Renata Antonangelo, Machado Thais Gomes, Pontes Laura Regina Antunes, Imparato José Carlos Pettorossi, Raggio Daniela Prócida, Mendes Fausto Medeiros. Does detection of active initial caries lesions in primary teeth improve clinical outcomes? CARDEC-02 randomized controlled trial of diagnostic-treatment strategies guided by different caries thresholds.. Caries research. 2026. DOI: 10.1159/cre/abuag011.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.