European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2018
Short-term outcomes of single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in mediastinal diseases.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Qiuyuan, Sihoe Alan, Wang Haifeng, Gonzalez-Rivas Diego, Zhu Yuming, Xie Dong, Jiang Gening
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Although there is growing interest in single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for a number of thoracic operations, there is still not enough known about its use for mediastinal pathologies. The present study was aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in comparison with the multi-port variants in terms of short-term perioperative outcomes.
METHODS: From July 2013 to December 2015, 285 consecutive non-myasthenic adult patients undergoing single- or multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal diseases including thymoma were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified depending on whether the pathology was thymoma. A propensity score matching pertaining to the approach used was performed within each stratified category. Perioperative outcomes were compared between matched cohorts.
RESULTS: During the study period, 141 (49.5%) patients were treated with single-port thoracoscopic surgery. Preoperative variables were comparable between both pairs of cohorts after matching. No morbidity or mortality occurred, except 1 case of empyema in a 2-port case. Single-port technique exhibited shorter operation time (thymoma: 78.8 vs 120.0 min, P = 0.011; non-thymoma: 78.4 vs 107.9 min, P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (thymoma: 42.0 vs 78.4 ml, P = 0.002; non-thymoma: 46.0 vs 62.2 ml, P = 0.001) and a lower postoperative 10-point visual analogue scale pain score (thymoma: 2.6 vs 3.3, P = 0.026; non-thymoma: 2.4 vs 3.2, P < 0.001) than multi-port techniques in both patient categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery is a safe approach for patients with loco-regional mediastinal disease, with potential advantages of shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding and less postoperative pain when compared with multi-port techniques.
METHODS: From July 2013 to December 2015, 285 consecutive non-myasthenic adult patients undergoing single- or multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal diseases including thymoma were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified depending on whether the pathology was thymoma. A propensity score matching pertaining to the approach used was performed within each stratified category. Perioperative outcomes were compared between matched cohorts.
RESULTS: During the study period, 141 (49.5%) patients were treated with single-port thoracoscopic surgery. Preoperative variables were comparable between both pairs of cohorts after matching. No morbidity or mortality occurred, except 1 case of empyema in a 2-port case. Single-port technique exhibited shorter operation time (thymoma: 78.8 vs 120.0 min, P = 0.011; non-thymoma: 78.4 vs 107.9 min, P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (thymoma: 42.0 vs 78.4 ml, P = 0.002; non-thymoma: 46.0 vs 62.2 ml, P = 0.001) and a lower postoperative 10-point visual analogue scale pain score (thymoma: 2.6 vs 3.3, P = 0.026; non-thymoma: 2.4 vs 3.2, P < 0.001) than multi-port techniques in both patient categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery is a safe approach for patients with loco-regional mediastinal disease, with potential advantages of shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding and less postoperative pain when compared with multi-port techniques.