International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
Evaluation of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes according to the phenotypic types of polycystic ovary syndrome: A prospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eralp Berat, Ibanoglu Mujde Can, Engin-Ustun Yaprak
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in the phenotypic subtypes of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
METHODS: This prospective cohort included the patients with PCOS (n = 121) diagnosed according to the presence of androgen excess, ovulatory dysfunction, and/or polycystic ovary morphology and healthy controls (n = 125). We stratified PCOS as phenotype A (n = 45), phenotype B (n = 8), phenotype C (n = 32) and phenotype D (n = 35) and followed throughout pregnancy, comparing their outcomes.
RESULTS: The study population had a mean age of 28.7 ± 4.9 years and a mean BMI of 31.6 kg/m2 with no difference between the groups. Primary cesarean deliveries were significantly more common in PCOS patients (23.3%) than in the control group (17.6%, P = 0.021). The phenotype A group had significantly higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (42.2%, P < 0.001) and fetal macrosomia (14.6%, P = 0.002) compared with the control group (4.8% and 0.8%m respectively). We detected a significantly lower rate of normal risk score on the double screening test in the PCOS group (59.0%) than in the control group (75.4%) and in the other groups (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The rates of GDM, fetal macrosomia, and cesarean section were higher in the PCOS group, depending on the phenotype. We observed changes in risk calculation according to phenotypic types at aneuploidy screening.
METHODS: This prospective cohort included the patients with PCOS (n = 121) diagnosed according to the presence of androgen excess, ovulatory dysfunction, and/or polycystic ovary morphology and healthy controls (n = 125). We stratified PCOS as phenotype A (n = 45), phenotype B (n = 8), phenotype C (n = 32) and phenotype D (n = 35) and followed throughout pregnancy, comparing their outcomes.
RESULTS: The study population had a mean age of 28.7 ± 4.9 years and a mean BMI of 31.6 kg/m2 with no difference between the groups. Primary cesarean deliveries were significantly more common in PCOS patients (23.3%) than in the control group (17.6%, P = 0.021). The phenotype A group had significantly higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (42.2%, P < 0.001) and fetal macrosomia (14.6%, P = 0.002) compared with the control group (4.8% and 0.8%m respectively). We detected a significantly lower rate of normal risk score on the double screening test in the PCOS group (59.0%) than in the control group (75.4%) and in the other groups (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The rates of GDM, fetal macrosomia, and cesarean section were higher in the PCOS group, depending on the phenotype. We observed changes in risk calculation according to phenotypic types at aneuploidy screening.