MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_8

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2010

Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases.

Grosse Scott D, Kalman Lisa, Khoury Muin J

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The conventional criteria for evaluating genetic tests include analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility. Analytical validity refers to a test's ability to measure the genotype of interest accurately and reliably. Clinical validity refers to a test's ability to detect or predict the clinical disorder or phenotype associated with the genotype. Clinical utility of a test is a measure of its usefulness in the clinic and resulting changes in clinical endpoints. In addition, the utility to individuals and families of genomic information, or personal utility, should be considered. This chapter identifies methodological and data issues involved in assessing each type of validity or utility. The validity and utility of a test must be considered in a specific context, which include diagnostic testing, newborn screening, prenatal carrier screening, and family or cascade screening. Specific rare disorders addressed include cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, Huntington disease, as well as cancer associated with BRCA mutations.

Для цитирования: Grosse Scott D, Kalman Lisa, Khoury Muin J. Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases.. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.