MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.004

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2025

Role of interproximal contacts in implant-supported crown stability: A finite element analysis study.

Krommydas Konstantinos, Papaioannou Efthymia, Karagiannidou Chrysanthi, Kirmanidou Yvone, Rabah Bahaa, Niakou Athina, Karatsis Evaggelos, Michalakis Polychronis, Pissiotis Argyris, Michalakis Konstantinos, Tsouknidas Alexander

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Screw loosening remains a frequent complication with implant-supported prostheses. While clinical evidence suggests that posterior single implant crowns present a high rate of complications, whether the absence of interproximal contacts with adjacent natural teeth is a contributing factor to these complications remains unclear.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this finite element analysis study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of single implant-supported crowns placed in the posterior mandible. Two variables were investigated: the impact of implant position (first molar versus second molar) and the nature of the interproximal contact with the adjacent teeth (mesial versus mesial and distal interproximal contacts).

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Three mandibular models were constructed using microtomography: fully dentate (control), partially edentulous with a missing second molar replaced by a single implant-supported crown (mesial interproximal contact only), and partially edentulous with a missing first molar replaced by a single implant-supported crown (mesial and distal interproximal contacts). The finite element analysis simulated occlusal loading during masticatory function. Stress distribution was evaluated by using the von Mises stress criterion, with principal stress analysis for bone anisotropy. Model validation was performed against experimental tooth displacement data.

RESULTS

Implants with both interproximal contacts (first molar position) exhibited more evenly distributed stress and significantly lower stress concentrations on the implant neck compared with the implant with only a mesial interproximal contact (second molar position). The second molar position showed higher stress at the implant-abutment connection.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant positioning and the number of interproximal contacts significantly influenced stress distribution and prosthesis stability. Implants placed between natural teeth present a lower risk of screw loosening and enhanced long-term crown stability.

Для цитирования: Krommydas Konstantinos, Papaioannou Efthymia, Karagiannidou Chrysanthi, Kirmanidou Yvone, Rabah Bahaa, Niakou Athina, Karatsis Evaggelos, Michalakis Polychronis, Pissiotis Argyris, Michalakis Konstantinos, Tsouknidas Alexander. Role of interproximal contacts in implant-supported crown stability: A finite element analysis study.. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.