Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2024
Stress distribution by parafunctional loading on tooth-implant, implant-implant, and tooth-tooth-supported prosthesis: A comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ravindran P Ambili, Raghavan Rohit, Christopher Kiran, Sramadathil Sethu, George Ann, Sasi Athira Kattachirakunnel
Аннотация
AIM: The study's objective was to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth-implant, implant-implant, and tooth-tooth supported prostheses under parafunctional loading in axial and oblique directions employing a 3D finite element analysis in the mandibular posterior region which had D3 bone (porous cortical bone and fine trabecular bone).
SETTING AND DESIGN: In vitro study, Finite element analysis.
METERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography data was used by Mimics software (Materialize Mimics 19) to create a three-dimensional finite element simulation of the jaw. Solid Works 2018 (Dassault Systems) was used to produce a geometric 3D model of the three systems. Each model consisted of a bone, an implant, and teeth (Model I tooth-tooth supported, Model II tooth-implant supported and Model III implant-implant supported). The three models' geometrical models were transferred to Ansys Workbench (19.2 software) for the analysis portion. A load that mimicked masticatory force was delivered in both axial and oblique directions.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: In the present study, statistical analysis was not required because 3D finite element analysis uses deterministic numerical methods to simulate physical behavior and stress distribution patterns.
RESULT: The results demonstrated that under the parafunctional combined loading process, the implant- implant supported prosthesis showed significantly higher stress concentrations in the bone. It was found that the cortical bone around the crestal region had the highest stresses.
CONCLUSION: Within the constraints of this investigation, we could draw the following conclusion: Of the three models, the tooth-tooth supported prosthesis exhibited the least amount of stress distribution, which was also least when functional loading was applied in the axial direction.
SETTING AND DESIGN: In vitro study, Finite element analysis.
METERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography data was used by Mimics software (Materialize Mimics 19) to create a three-dimensional finite element simulation of the jaw. Solid Works 2018 (Dassault Systems) was used to produce a geometric 3D model of the three systems. Each model consisted of a bone, an implant, and teeth (Model I tooth-tooth supported, Model II tooth-implant supported and Model III implant-implant supported). The three models' geometrical models were transferred to Ansys Workbench (19.2 software) for the analysis portion. A load that mimicked masticatory force was delivered in both axial and oblique directions.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: In the present study, statistical analysis was not required because 3D finite element analysis uses deterministic numerical methods to simulate physical behavior and stress distribution patterns.
RESULT: The results demonstrated that under the parafunctional combined loading process, the implant- implant supported prosthesis showed significantly higher stress concentrations in the bone. It was found that the cortical bone around the crestal region had the highest stresses.
CONCLUSION: Within the constraints of this investigation, we could draw the following conclusion: Of the three models, the tooth-tooth supported prosthesis exhibited the least amount of stress distribution, which was also least when functional loading was applied in the axial direction.