MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11406/rinketsu.57.575

Медицинская библиотека · [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology · 2016

[Prognostic significance of pleural/pericardial effusion and treatment optimization of PMBL].

Aoki Tomohiro

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The optimal treatment strategy for primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) remains unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 345 patients with newly diagnosed PMBL to identify prognostic factors and optimal treatments. Focusing on patients treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone, and rituximab (R-CHOP) (N=187), a higher International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the presence of pleural or pericardial effusion were identified as adverse prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients treated with R-CHOP without consolidative radiation therapy (RT) [IPI: hazard ratio (HR), 4.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-12.13; P=0.007; effusion: HR, 4.93; 95% CI, 1.37-17.69; P=0.015]. Combined with IPI and the presence of pleural or pericardial effusion for the stratification of patients treated with R-CHOP without RT, those with lower IPI and the absence of effusion comprised approximately onehalf of these patients and could be identified as curable [OS and progression free survival (PFS) at 4 years, 95% and 87%, respectively)] Taken together, our simple indicators of IPI and the presence of effusion could stratify patients with PMBL and thereby facilitate treatment selection.

Для цитирования: Aoki Tomohiro. [Prognostic significance of pleural/pericardial effusion and treatment optimization of PMBL].. [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology. 2016. DOI: 10.11406/rinketsu.57.575.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.