MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011254

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ quality & safety · 2020

"It's not just hacking for the sake of it": a qualitative study of health innovators' views on patient-driven open innovations, quality and safety.

Rivard Lysanne, Lehoux Pascale, Alami Hassane

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Open do-it-yourself (DIY) health innovations raise new dilemmas for patient-oriented and service-oriented scholars and healthcare providers. Our study aimed to generate practical insights into quality and safety issues to patient care raised by two volunteer-run, open DIY solutions: Nightscout Project (patient-driven, open-source software for type 1 diabetes management) and e-NABLE (volunteers who design and three-dimensionally print upper-limb assistive devices). To this end, we examined the views of health innovators who are knowledgeable about medical devices standards and regulations.

METHODS

We applied a multimedia-based, data-elicitation technique to conduct indepth interviews with a diversified sample of 31 health innovators practising in two Canadian provinces (Quebec and Ontario). An exploratory thematic analysis approach was used to identify respondents' reasoning processes and compare their overall judgements of Nightscout and e-NABLE.

RESULTS

Respondents pondered the following quality and safety issues: importance of the need addressed; accessibility; volunteers' ability to develop and maintain a safe solution of good quality; risks involved for users; consequences of not using the solution; and liability. Overall, innovators see Nightscout as a high-risk DIY solution that requires expert involvement and e-NABLE as a low-risk one that fills a hard-to-meet gap.

CONCLUSION

Health innovators generally support patient-driven initiatives but also call for the involvement of professionals who possess complementary skills and knowledge. Our findings provide a list of issues healthcare providers may discuss with patients during clinical consultations to document potential risks and benefits of open DIY solutions. To inform new policy approaches, we propose the development of publicly funded umbrella organisations to act as intermediaries between open DIY solutions and regulatory bodies to help them meet quality and safety standards.

Для цитирования: Rivard Lysanne, Lehoux Pascale, Alami Hassane. "It's not just hacking for the sake of it": a qualitative study of health innovators' views on patient-driven open innovations, quality and safety.. BMJ quality & safety. 2020. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011254.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.