DOI 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.10.007
[Botulinum toxin injections and hypertonic upper limbs. Which functional results?].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections for hypertonic upper limbs in patients with residual motricity that allows a functional use of the hand.
METHODS
Patients were seen between February 2000 and November 2002, before and after botulinum toxin injections for hypertonic upper limbs due to upper motor neuron syndrome. All patients had voluntary motricity in fingers and wrist extensors. Impairment (range of motion, spasticity [Ashworth's scale]), pain (10 centimeters visual analog scale) prehension (400-point measure) and patients' satisfaction were recorded. Two or three functional goals were predefined. Patients were injected after locating the target area with neurostimulation. The aim of the injections was functional improvement.
RESULTS
Eight patients were included. After injections, mean pain score decreased by 3.4 points; mean spasticity decreased by 1.0; and prehension improved, especially for bimanual functions. Three-quarters of the functional goals were reached. Optimal efficacy required repeated injections, with modification of muscle targets and doses.
CONCLUSION
Botulinum toxin injection is efficient for impairment, pain and prehension in hypertonic upper limbs, even if the hypertonic hand is still the "nondominant" hand. Motricity in antagonist muscles is essential for functional improvement, and the assessment must include bimanual tasks. Intrinsic as well as extrinsic muscles must be injected and a neurostimulator used for forearm muscles. Comparative studies are required to define more clearly the place of this treatment among medical and surgical treatments of spasticity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.