Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi · 2005
[The changes and their clinical significance of D-dimer and platelet glycoprotein in patients with coronary heart disease].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ma Jian-lin, Wang Sheng, Li Xin-ming, Su Zhe-tan, Li Bin, Chen Guan-liang, Li Jin, Wang Wei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore the changes and their clinical significance of D-dimer and platelet glycoprotein (GP) in patients with coronary heart disease.
METHODS: D-dimer and GP in 20 patients with stable angina (SA group), 48 patients with unstable angina (UA group), and 20 control cases were measured. The changes of D-dimer and GP in patients with and without coronary events were compared. The sensitivity of those changes in the diagnosis of coronary events was evaluated.
RESULTS: There were significant differences of D-dimer and GP between UA group and SA group or control group (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between SA group and control group (P > 0.05). There were also significant differences of D-dimer and GP between patients with coronary events and patients without coronary events (P < 0.05). In the sensitivity test for detecting coronary events, D-dimer and GPIIb, GPIIIa were much more sensitive than other parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer and GPIIb, GPIIIa may be regarded as the indexes of coronary thrombosis and used for predicting the severity of coronary events.
METHODS: D-dimer and GP in 20 patients with stable angina (SA group), 48 patients with unstable angina (UA group), and 20 control cases were measured. The changes of D-dimer and GP in patients with and without coronary events were compared. The sensitivity of those changes in the diagnosis of coronary events was evaluated.
RESULTS: There were significant differences of D-dimer and GP between UA group and SA group or control group (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between SA group and control group (P > 0.05). There were also significant differences of D-dimer and GP between patients with coronary events and patients without coronary events (P < 0.05). In the sensitivity test for detecting coronary events, D-dimer and GPIIb, GPIIIa were much more sensitive than other parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer and GPIIb, GPIIIa may be regarded as the indexes of coronary thrombosis and used for predicting the severity of coronary events.