MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/1305-7456.149653

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of dentistry · 2015

Evaluation of intrabony defects treated with platelet-rich fibrin or autogenous bone graft: A comparative analysis.

Mathur Ashish, Bains Vivek Kumar, Gupta Vivek, Jhingran Rajesh, Singh G P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to compare clinically and radiographically the efficacy of autologous platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and autogenous bone graft (ABG) obtained using bone scrapper in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Thirty-eight intrabony defects (IBDs) were treated with either open flap debridement (OFD) with PRF or OFD with ABG. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. The defect-fill and defect resolution at baseline and 6 months were calculated radiographically (intraoral periapical radiographs [IOPA] and orthopantomogram [OPG]).

RESULTS

Significant probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, defect fill and defect resolution at both PRF and ABG treated sites with OFD was observed. However, inter-group comparison was non-significant (P > 0.05). The bivariate correlation results revealed that any of the two radiographic techniques (IOPA and OPG) can be used for analysis of the regenerative therapy in IBDs.

CONCLUSION

The use of either PRF or ABG were effective in the treatment of three wall IBDs with an uneventful healing of the sites.

Для цитирования: Mathur Ashish, Bains Vivek Kumar, Gupta Vivek, Jhingran Rajesh, Singh G P. Evaluation of intrabony defects treated with platelet-rich fibrin or autogenous bone graft: A comparative analysis.. European journal of dentistry. 2015. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.149653.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.