MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0972-124x.142445

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology · 2014

Comparative evaluation of single application of 2% whole turmeric gel versus 1% chlorhexidine gel in chronic periodontitis patients: A pilot study.

Jaswal Ruchika, Dhawan Shivani, Grover Vishakha, Malhotra Ranjan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To evaluate and compare the clinical effects of topical subgingival application of 2% whole turmeric gel and 1% chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients suffering from chronic periodontitis.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Fifteen patients with localized or generalized chronic periodontitis with a pocket depth of 5-7 mm were selected. In each patient, on completion of SRP, three non-adjacent sites in three different quadrants were randomly divided into three different groups, that is, Group I: Those receiving 2% turmeric gel, Group II: Those receiving 1% chlorhexidine gel (Hexigel), and Group III: SRP alone (control site). Plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, and clinical attachment levels were determined at baseline, 30 days, and 45 days.

RESULTS

Group II as a local drug system was better than Group III. Group I showed comparable improvement in all the clinical parameters as Group II.

CONCLUSIONS

The experimental local drug delivery system containing 2% whole turmeric gel helped in reduction of probing depth and gain of clinical attachment levels.

Для цитирования: Jaswal Ruchika, Dhawan Shivani, Grover Vishakha, Malhotra Ranjan. Comparative evaluation of single application of 2% whole turmeric gel versus 1% chlorhexidine gel in chronic periodontitis patients: A pilot study.. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2014. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124x.142445.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.