DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000000612
Clinical and radiological guidance in managing facial nerve schwannomas.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To present a review of all patients diagnosed with a facial nerve schwannoma (FNS) managed in our center over almost two decades, and suggest guidelines for their classification and management.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective case review
SETTING
Tertiary referral center
PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients with a facial nerve schwannoma
INTERVENTION: Conservative or surgical management depending on clinical and radiological features
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient demographics, site of tumor, and clinical symptoms, including facial nerve function (House-Brackmann score) at baseline and follow-up. In those managed surgically, operative approach and surgical outcomes were also recorded.
RESULTS
Of 28 patients, 16 were male. Mean age at presentation was 46 years. The majority presented with either facial weakness or hearing loss. The internal auditory canal segment of the facial nerve was the most commonly affected (19/28, 68%). Multi-segmental lesions were found in almost half (46%) of patients. Facial weakness was most commonly associated with involvement of the labyrinthine segment (89%). Overall, 16 (57%) patients were managed surgically.
CONCLUSION
FNS may be difficult to distinguish on both clinical and imaging grounds from other cerebellopontine pathologies on the basis of audiovestibular symptoms alone. The presence of facial weakness in combination with imaging findings suggestive of FNS is highly suggestive for FNS. In patients with brainstem compression, rapid tumor growth, or House-Brackmann greater than 4, we suggest a surgical approach based on preoperative audiovestibular status, helping optimize long-term facial function and minimize morbidity. Facial nerve reanimation at the time of primary surgery is preferred.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.