[Prevalence of lymph node involvement in patients with endometrial cancer, Colombia 2009-2016: Exploratory analysis of associated factors].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine the prevalence of lymph node involvement in patients with endometrial cancer and to explore factors associated with lymph node invasion.
METHODS
Prevalence study with exploratory analysis. The study included patients with endometrial cancer who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy plus bilateral salpyingooophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in seven oncology centers in Colombia between 2009 and 2016. Patients who had received prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy, with a histological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors, carcinosarcomas or synchronous or metachronous lesions were excluded. Non-probabilistic sampling. Sample size n=290. Measured variables: sociodemographic, clinical and histopathological, and pelvic or para-aortic lymph node involvement. The prevalence for the period is presented. The exploratory analysis was conducted using crude odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR by means of a multivariate model (unconditional logistic regression).
RESULTS
Overall, 467 cases were retrieved. Of them, 163 were excluded because of non-availability of all the variables. In total, 304 patients were studied. The prevalence of lymph node involvement was 15.8 % (48/304). In the crude and adjusted analysis, factors associated with lymph node involvement were lymphovascular invasion (adjusted OR: 9.32; 95 % CI 4.27-21.15) and myometrial invasion (adjusted OR: 3.95; 95 % CI 1.29-14.98).
CONCLUSIONS
Of the patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, 15 % have lymph node involvement. Less invasive diagnostic options than radical surgery to ascertain lymph node invasion should be assessed.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.