Hepato-gastroenterology · 2002
Combined endoscopic and radiologic intervention to treat esophageal varices.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taniai N, Onda M, Tajiri T, Yoshida H, Mamada Y
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In patients with esophageal varices, we investigated the impact on long-term outcome of combining interventional radiologic procedures with endoscopic therapy.
METHODOLOGY: Of 133 patients with esophageal varices, 86 were treated with endoscopic therapy alone and 47 underwent endoscopic therapy in addition to interventional radiologic procedures. End-points considered during 5-years of follow-up included recurrent bleeding and retreatment.
RESULTS: Bleeding rates were 24.4% in the endoscopy group and 25.4% in the combined therapy group. Retreatment rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the endoscopy group versus the combined therapy group were 40.7% versus 30.3%, 72.0% versus 67.5%, and 88.2% versus 80.5%, respectively, representing no significant difference between two groups. However, cumulative retreatment rates in Child's class C cases were significantly lower in the combined therapy group than in the endoscopy group (P = 0.025). Patients who had combined therapy which included all embolizing techniques showed significantly lower retreatment rates than patients treated with endoscopy alone (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In combination, interventional radiologic and endoscopic therapies are highly effective and can improve long-term outcome in patients with esophageal varices, especially those with poor liver function and those who undergo embolization by all techniques.
METHODOLOGY: Of 133 patients with esophageal varices, 86 were treated with endoscopic therapy alone and 47 underwent endoscopic therapy in addition to interventional radiologic procedures. End-points considered during 5-years of follow-up included recurrent bleeding and retreatment.
RESULTS: Bleeding rates were 24.4% in the endoscopy group and 25.4% in the combined therapy group. Retreatment rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the endoscopy group versus the combined therapy group were 40.7% versus 30.3%, 72.0% versus 67.5%, and 88.2% versus 80.5%, respectively, representing no significant difference between two groups. However, cumulative retreatment rates in Child's class C cases were significantly lower in the combined therapy group than in the endoscopy group (P = 0.025). Patients who had combined therapy which included all embolizing techniques showed significantly lower retreatment rates than patients treated with endoscopy alone (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In combination, interventional radiologic and endoscopic therapies are highly effective and can improve long-term outcome in patients with esophageal varices, especially those with poor liver function and those who undergo embolization by all techniques.