Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
Novel dual-reference approach facilitates the activation mapping and catheter ablation of premature atrial complexes with non-pulmonary vein and non-superior vena cava origins.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Mu, Yang Mei, Li Wei, Zhang Peng-Pai, Zhang Rui, Mo Bin-Feng, Gong Chang-Qi, Han Ya-Qin, Sun Xiang-Hua, Wang Qun-Shan, Lu Qiu-Fen, Sun Jian, Li Yi-Gang
Аннотация
AIMS: Activation mapping of premature atrial complexes (PACs) proves challenging due to interference by mechanical bumping and non-targeted ectopies. This study aims to compare the mapping efficacy, instant success, and long-term recurrence of catheter ablation for PACs with non-pulmonary vein (PV) and non-superior vena cava (SVC) origins between the novel dual-reference approach (DRA) and the routine single-reference approach (SRA) of mapping.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PACs, or frequent residual PACs after atrial tachyarrhythmia ablation were enrolled. During activation mapping, the coronary sinus (CS) catheter was used as the only timing reference in the SRA group. In the DRA group, another catheter, which was spatially separated from the CS catheter, was used as the second reference. The timing difference between the two references was used to discriminate the targeted PACs from the uninterested rhythms. Procedural parameters and long-term recurrence were compared. A total of 188 patients (109 in SRA and 79 in DRA) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were similar. Compared with the SRA group, the DRA group had less repeated mapping (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.004), shorter mapping (15 ± 6 vs. 23 ± 7 min, P < 0.001) and procedural time (119 ± 28 vs. 132 ± 22 min, P = 0.001), similar procedural complication rates (3.6 vs. 3.8%, P > 0.999), higher instant success (96.2 vs. 87.2%, P = 0.039), and lower recurrence rate (15.2 vs. 29.3%, hazard ratio 1.943, P = 0.033) during a 24-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: As a novel strategy, the DRA shortens the procedural time and improves both instant and long-term success of PAC ablation, serving as a promising approach in mapping PACs with non-PV and non-SVC origins.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PACs, or frequent residual PACs after atrial tachyarrhythmia ablation were enrolled. During activation mapping, the coronary sinus (CS) catheter was used as the only timing reference in the SRA group. In the DRA group, another catheter, which was spatially separated from the CS catheter, was used as the second reference. The timing difference between the two references was used to discriminate the targeted PACs from the uninterested rhythms. Procedural parameters and long-term recurrence were compared. A total of 188 patients (109 in SRA and 79 in DRA) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were similar. Compared with the SRA group, the DRA group had less repeated mapping (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.004), shorter mapping (15 ± 6 vs. 23 ± 7 min, P < 0.001) and procedural time (119 ± 28 vs. 132 ± 22 min, P = 0.001), similar procedural complication rates (3.6 vs. 3.8%, P > 0.999), higher instant success (96.2 vs. 87.2%, P = 0.039), and lower recurrence rate (15.2 vs. 29.3%, hazard ratio 1.943, P = 0.033) during a 24-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: As a novel strategy, the DRA shortens the procedural time and improves both instant and long-term success of PAC ablation, serving as a promising approach in mapping PACs with non-PV and non-SVC origins.