MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1994

Медицинская библиотека · Ecancermedicalscience · 2025

Is active surveillance a good treatment option for stage 1 seminoma in a developing nation? Long-term outcomes from the Indian subcontinent.

Dhanawat Aditya, Samaddar Debdeep, Jadhav Bhagyashri, Tiwari Atul, Jobanputra Kunal, Tongaonkar Arnav, Shah Minit Jalan, Menon Nandini, Maitre Priyamvada, Pal Mahendra, Arora Amandeep, Ringe Aparna, Agrawal Archi, Menon Santosh, Prakash Gagan, Murthy Vedang, Noronha Vanita, Prabhash Kumar, Joshi Amit

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Stage 1 seminoma is treated with high inguinal orchiectomy (HIO) followed by either chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT) or active surveillance (AS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset of patients with seminoma treated at a comprehensive cancer care centre in India. Adolescent and adult males with stage 1 seminoma were included.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were analysed. The median age was 39 years (IQR: 32-48 years). Stage IA was more frequently seen and 105 (92.1%) patients underwent unilateral HIO. Chemotherapy was offered to 66 (57.9%) patients. AS was offered to 32 (28.1%) patients while RT was offered to 16 (14%). Only 14 (43.8%) of the 32 patients on AS strictly adhered to the institutional follow-up guidelines for at least 2 years post treatment. Of the 114 patients, 9 (7.9%) patients had radiological relapse, while 4 (3.5%) of them were symptomatic at relapse. Bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin were the most common regimen offered on relapse. The median follow-up of the cohort was 70.6 months (95% CI: 59.1-82 months). The mean relapse-free survival (RFS) was 107.7 months (95% CI: 102.5-112.8 months). The 1-, 2- and 5-year RFS were 97.3%, 95.5% and 92.4%, respectively. The mean overall survival (OS) was 114.9 months (95% CI: 113.2-116.6 months). The 2-, 5- and 8-year OS were 100%, 98.9% and 98.9%, respectively. There was no statistically significant benefit of 2 cycles over 1 cycle of carboplatin in terms of median RFS (96.5 versus 108.8 months, p = 0.260) or 5-year OS (95% versus 100%, p = 0.192). There was no statistically significant difference in RFS (p = 0.355) or OS (p = 0.684) based on treatment offered at baseline. There was no difference in survival between patients who strictly adhered to follow-up guidelines versus those who did not.

CONCLUSION

In a developing nation with constrained resources, AS remains a good treatment option for stage 1 seminoma with excellent long-term outcomes and freedom from the toxicities of chemotherapy.

Для цитирования: Dhanawat Aditya, Samaddar Debdeep, Jadhav Bhagyashri, Tiwari Atul, Jobanputra Kunal, Tongaonkar Arnav, Shah Minit Jalan, Menon Nandini, Maitre Priyamvada, Pal Mahendra, Arora Amandeep, Ringe Aparna, Agrawal Archi, Menon Santosh, Prakash Gagan, Murthy Vedang, Noronha Vanita, Prabhash Kumar, Joshi Amit. Is active surveillance a good treatment option for stage 1 seminoma in a developing nation? Long-term outcomes from the Indian subcontinent.. Ecancermedicalscience. 2025. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1994.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.