MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-33432-6

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2026

The efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine patch for postoperative pain in unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy: prospective randomized controlled pilot study.

Koo Bon-Wook, Bang Jung-Hyun, Park In-Sun, Kim Jin-Hee, Ahn Hong-Min, Oh Heung-Kwon, Lee Pyung-Bok

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Postoperative pain is a major concern in day surgery (DS), particularly after open inguinal herniorrhaphy. Reducing pain is important to decrease hospital stays and promote faster recovery. This study evaluated the lidocaine patch’s efficacy in managing acute postoperative pain following unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. In a randomized, double-blind trial, 32 patients were assigned to either the lidocaine or placebo patch groups, and pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) during rest, movement, and coughing. The lidocaine group reported significantly lower pain during coughing at discharge compared to the placebo group (3 ± 1.7 vs. 4.6 ± 2.7; p = 0.03), although opioid use did not differ significantly between groups. Overall, the lidocaine patch showed potential for reducing postoperative pain. However, given the limited sample size and the exploratory nature of this pilot study, these results should be interpreted with caution and validated in future large-scale, adequately powered clinical trials.

Для цитирования: Koo Bon-Wook, Bang Jung-Hyun, Park In-Sun, Kim Jin-Hee, Ahn Hong-Min, Oh Heung-Kwon, Lee Pyung-Bok. The efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine patch for postoperative pain in unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy: prospective randomized controlled pilot study.. Scientific reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-33432-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.