DOI 10.1227/ons.0000000000000115
Retreatment Strategies in Aneurysm Woven Endobridge Recurrences: A Case Series.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The treatment of wide-necked and bifurcation aneurysms has become a common indication for the Woven Endobridge (WEB) device. In many instances, WEB embolization fails and retreatment strategies for the recanalized aneurysms have not been established and may be challenging.
OBJECTIVE
To report an experience with retreatment strategies after WEB failure in 7 cases involving various aneurysm shapes, sizes, and location using multiple strategies including endovascular modalities and microsurgical clip ligation.
METHODS
Data were retrospectively collected from 1 high-volume cerebrovascular center for 7 patients treated with a WEB device for an aneurysm who subsequently required retreatment for that same aneurysm from 2015 through January 2021.
RESULTS
We identified 7 patients with WEB recurrences over a period of 6 years. Four patients initially presented with incidental findings, whereas 3 patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. One patient was lost to follow-up and presented with a rerupture, whereas the 6 other patients were diagnosed with routine follow-up. Two patients received clip ligation, 2 had simple coil embolization, 1 had stent-assisted coil embolization, 1 had a flow-diverting stent, and 1 patient required 2 retreatments; he received stent-assisted coil embolization for the first retreatment and a simple coil embolization for the second retreatment. All patients had excellent angiographic outcomes and no complications.
CONCLUSION
The authors conclude that aneurysm recurrence after WEB is very diverse, and no single modality can properly address all recurrences. Rather, an individualized approach based on aneurysm features, neurointerventionalist expertise, and patient preference should be implemented.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.