DOI 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.01.005
Diagnosis and treatment of Wernicke's encephalopathy: A systematic literature review.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) is a serious neurological disorder that is underdiagnosed. Despite limited clinical guidelines, the standard use of intravenous (IV) thiamine is underutilized and remains an area of research deserving much attention.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review using Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases to identify and summarize the literature on IV thiamine treatment in WE. Human studies with WE patients who received ≥100 mg of thiamine IV met inclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and case reports were included.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies were included: 20 case reports, five retrospective studies, one prospective study and one randomized control trial. Of the case reports, 11 (55%) cases were female, and the average age of all cases was 45 years (SD = 15). The other seven studies included 688 patients; the average age was 52 years (SD = 9), and 266 (38.7%) were female. Among the case reports, neurological and clinical findings were used to diagnose WE in 16 (80%) cases. MRI was utilized to diagnose 15 (75%) cases. 500 mg IV thiamine TID was reported in 12 case reports (60%). 18 (90%) of case reports had partial or complete resolution of symptoms following IV thiamine.
CONCLUSION
IV thiamine can alleviate neurological symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and brain imaging lesions associated with WE. We found key limitations in the evidence for IV thiamine and diagnostic standards for WE. Future targeted research should establish clear diagnostic and treatment guidelines for WE to prevent this serious condition from being underdiagnosed or undertreated.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.