DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.028
Electrical Storm in Chagas Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Predictors, Outcome, and Arrhythmic Characteristics in a Prospective Registry.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This study of patients with Chagas heart disease (CHD) with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death sought to compare the characteristics of those with or without electrical storm (ES) during long-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND
ES is a common problem in patients with CHD harboring an ICD, but data on clinical predictors and outcomes are limited.
METHODS
The authors retrospectively evaluated 110 patients with CHD with a mean follow-up of 1,949 ± 1,271 days. Demographic, clinical, arrhythmia characteristics, ICD treatment, and death data were collected. Descriptive statistics included mean ± SD and Fisher exact tests used for comparisons. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
The ES group (n = 57; 43 men; age 62 ± 10 years) and the non-ES group (n = 53; 43 men; age 57 ± 14 years) had similar baseline demographic and clinical parameters, but left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the ES group (44 ± 14% vs. 37 ± 14%; p = 0.02) and QRS duration was shorter (109 ± 35 ms vs. 134 ± 36 ms; p = 0.0027). Mortality rates were comparable in the 2 groups (odds ratio: 1.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 1.85; p = 0.44). The ES group presented 116 ES (2.03 ±1.47, 1 to 6). A total of 2,953 (61%) arrhythmic events required ICD therapy. No deaths occurred directly caused by ES, but clinical triggers were reported in 20 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
ES is frequent in CHD but in itself does not carry a worse prognosis in this study population and was not associated with a more depressed left ventricular systolic function or a longer QRS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.