DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.038
Line production system for multiple lymphaticovenular anastomoses.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
A drawback of multiple lymphaticovenular anastomoses (LVAs) is the need for at least two microsurgeons and the same number of microscopes. In practice, many hospitals find it difficult to access such resources. We have developed a novel line production system (LPS) to address this problem. We assessed whether or not the LPS is better than the conventional dual microscope (DM) system when performing multiple LVAs.
METHODS
An LPS group, wherein a novice microsurgeon used loupes to dissect lymphatics and an expert microsurgeon used a microscope to perform the LVAs, and a DM (control) group, wherein the surgeons used microscopes to perform the LVAs. We recorded the lymphatic detection rate through the loupes and the diameter of the detected lymphatics. We also investigated the impact of using the LPS by comparing the number and quality of LVAs and improvement in lymphedema between the study groups.
RESULTS
The mean lymphatic detection rate was 81%±15.60%, and the mean size of lymphatics was 0.44 ± 0.12 mm in the LPS. The number of LVAs/h in LPS was significantly higher than that in DM (2.15 ± 0.20 vs. 1.38 ± 0.17; p < 0.01). The number of successful LVAs/h in LPS was significantly higher than that in the DM (2.08 ± 0.22 vs. 0.84 ± 0.14; P < 0.01). Mean rate of improvement in LEL index was significantly higher than that in DM (9.36 ± 1.85 vs. 6.93 ± 1.73; P < 0.01).
DISCUSSION: The number and quality of the LVAs increase using the LPS, which leads to further improvement in lymphedema, with fewer microscopes and microsurgeons and a shorter operating time.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.