Journal of glaucoma · 2025
Social Vulnerability Associated With Frequency of Visual Field and Optical Coherence Tomography Testing in Glaucoma Patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Daniel X, Hashimi Hannah, Ding Leona, Bojikian Karine D, Chen Andrew
Аннотация
PRECIS: Higher Social Vulnerability Index scores, limited-English proficiency, and retirement/disability status were associated with lower odds of completing one visual field and optical coherence tomography/year in glaucoma patients.
PURPOSE: To assess the correlation between sociodemographic factors and the Social Vulnerability Index to the likelihood of not receiving 1 visual field test and 1 retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography test per year.
METHODS: Patient records with glaucoma living in Washington state from a single academic institution (2014-2021) were reviewed. Those with a single visit, an address with no Social Vulnerability Index score, or a diagnosis relating to pre-glaucoma, glaucoma-suspect, or ocular hypertension were excluded. Demographic data, Social Vulnerability Index scores, and the number of visual fields and optical coherence tomography were collected. Patients were classified as meeting testing criteria if they had at least one visual field and optical coherence tomography per year. Logistic regression was used to assess whether sociodemographic factors and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with not meeting testing criteria.
RESULTS: Three thousand nine hundred seventy-one patients were included: 1470 (37.0%), 1834 (46.2%), and 1413 (35.6%), had at least 1 visual field/year, at least 1 optical coherence tomography/year, and at least 1 visual field and 1 optical coherence tomography/year, respectively. On average 0.8±0.6 visual field/year and 0.9±0.6 optical coherence tomography/year were performed. Limited English proficiency ( P =0.009), being disabled/retired ( P =0.003), and higher Social Vulnerability Index scores ( P <0.001) were associated with higher odds of not meeting testing criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Although higher Social Vulnerability Index scores were linked to reduced odds of glaucoma testing, specific sociodemographic factors-such as limited English proficiency and retirement/disability-further reduced the odds.
PURPOSE: To assess the correlation between sociodemographic factors and the Social Vulnerability Index to the likelihood of not receiving 1 visual field test and 1 retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography test per year.
METHODS: Patient records with glaucoma living in Washington state from a single academic institution (2014-2021) were reviewed. Those with a single visit, an address with no Social Vulnerability Index score, or a diagnosis relating to pre-glaucoma, glaucoma-suspect, or ocular hypertension were excluded. Demographic data, Social Vulnerability Index scores, and the number of visual fields and optical coherence tomography were collected. Patients were classified as meeting testing criteria if they had at least one visual field and optical coherence tomography per year. Logistic regression was used to assess whether sociodemographic factors and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with not meeting testing criteria.
RESULTS: Three thousand nine hundred seventy-one patients were included: 1470 (37.0%), 1834 (46.2%), and 1413 (35.6%), had at least 1 visual field/year, at least 1 optical coherence tomography/year, and at least 1 visual field and 1 optical coherence tomography/year, respectively. On average 0.8±0.6 visual field/year and 0.9±0.6 optical coherence tomography/year were performed. Limited English proficiency ( P =0.009), being disabled/retired ( P =0.003), and higher Social Vulnerability Index scores ( P <0.001) were associated with higher odds of not meeting testing criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Although higher Social Vulnerability Index scores were linked to reduced odds of glaucoma testing, specific sociodemographic factors-such as limited English proficiency and retirement/disability-further reduced the odds.