American journal of dentistry · 2004
Guided tissue regeneration in Class II furcation defects using a resorbable polylactic acid barrier.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bremm Laerte L, Sallum Antonio W, Casati Marcio Z, Nociti Francisco H Júnior, Sallum Enilson A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate, clinically, the use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with a resorbable polylactic acid membrane (Atrisorb) in the treatment of Class II furcation defects in humans.
METHODS: The study included 10 patients with two comparable Class II furcations in lower molars. The lesions were randomly assigned to one of the treatments: GTR with an Atrisorb resorbable membrane (test) or open flap debridement (control). The following clinical parameters were recorded before the surgeries (baseline) and after a healing period of 6 months: relative vertical clinical attachment level, relative horizontal clinical attachment level, probing depths, position of the gingival margin and width of the keratinized tissue.
RESULTS: After the intra-group comparison (baseline versus 6 months), statistically significant differences were found for the parameters: probing depth, relative vertical clinical attachment level and relative horizontal clinical attachment level, in both groups (P < 0.05). Comparing the two groups, a statistically significant difference was found in the probing depth reduction favoring the GTR group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the other parameters.
METHODS: The study included 10 patients with two comparable Class II furcations in lower molars. The lesions were randomly assigned to one of the treatments: GTR with an Atrisorb resorbable membrane (test) or open flap debridement (control). The following clinical parameters were recorded before the surgeries (baseline) and after a healing period of 6 months: relative vertical clinical attachment level, relative horizontal clinical attachment level, probing depths, position of the gingival margin and width of the keratinized tissue.
RESULTS: After the intra-group comparison (baseline versus 6 months), statistically significant differences were found for the parameters: probing depth, relative vertical clinical attachment level and relative horizontal clinical attachment level, in both groups (P < 0.05). Comparing the two groups, a statistically significant difference was found in the probing depth reduction favoring the GTR group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the other parameters.