Journal of periodontology · 2004
Clinical evaluation of a composite bone graft with a calcium sulfate barrier.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harris Randall J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a composite bone graft (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, calcium sulfate, tetracycline, and porous hydroxyapatite) and calcium sulfate barrier to treat non-furcation osseous defects.
METHODS: One hundred patients were treated with the technique. The preoperative measurements were compared to the postoperative measurements (mean 5.2 months) to determine whether the technique had a statistically significant effect. Various factors were evaluated to determine whether they could be related to improved or diminished results.
RESULTS: The surgical procedure produced a statistically significant change in the clinical measurements. The mean recession increased from 0.8 to 1.8 mm; the mean probing depth decreased from 8.5 to 3.8 mm; and the attachment level improved from 9.3 to 5.5 mm. Non-smokers, defects in the mandibular arch, defects with deeper probing depths, or defects with greater attachment loss had statistically significant changes in one or more of the clinical parameters evaluated.
CONCLUSION: The technique examined in this study (composite bone graft + calcium sulfate barrier) was an effective method to improve the clinical measurements.
METHODS: One hundred patients were treated with the technique. The preoperative measurements were compared to the postoperative measurements (mean 5.2 months) to determine whether the technique had a statistically significant effect. Various factors were evaluated to determine whether they could be related to improved or diminished results.
RESULTS: The surgical procedure produced a statistically significant change in the clinical measurements. The mean recession increased from 0.8 to 1.8 mm; the mean probing depth decreased from 8.5 to 3.8 mm; and the attachment level improved from 9.3 to 5.5 mm. Non-smokers, defects in the mandibular arch, defects with deeper probing depths, or defects with greater attachment loss had statistically significant changes in one or more of the clinical parameters evaluated.
CONCLUSION: The technique examined in this study (composite bone graft + calcium sulfate barrier) was an effective method to improve the clinical measurements.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlveolar Bone LossAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationCalcium SulfateDurapatiteFemaleGingival RecessionGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalHumansMaleMembranes, ArtificialMiddle AgedPeriodontal Attachment LossPeriodontal PocketTetracycline