MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2018
Free radial forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of hemiglossectomy defects: A comparison of quality of life.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Pei-Pei, Meng Li, Shen Jun, Liu Hao, Zhang Jun, Xiang Xu, Yan Ying-Bin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the retrospective study was to compare the differences of quality of life (QOL) outcomes 2 or more years postoperatively between the free radial forearm flap (FRFF) and anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) in reconstruction of defects of a hemiglossectomy.
METHODS: Ninety patients who had a lapse ≥2 years since the reconstructive flap surgery were evaluated by the University of Washington quality of life scale (UW-QOL), and Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck (PSS-HN).
RESULTS: Patients in the FRFF group reported statistically and clinically significantly better scores in the recreation, swallowing, chewing and speech domains of the UW-QOL compared with those in the ALTF group (P < .05). Similarly, FRFF provided better results in the understandability of speech and normalcy of diet of the PSS-HN, than the ALTF (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: FRFF had the advantage of oral functions, such as chewing, speech and swallowing, over the ALTF for reconstruction of defect of half of the tongue. These results may provide useful information for surgeons to select a suitable free flap for tongue reconstruction.
METHODS: Ninety patients who had a lapse ≥2 years since the reconstructive flap surgery were evaluated by the University of Washington quality of life scale (UW-QOL), and Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck (PSS-HN).
RESULTS: Patients in the FRFF group reported statistically and clinically significantly better scores in the recreation, swallowing, chewing and speech domains of the UW-QOL compared with those in the ALTF group (P < .05). Similarly, FRFF provided better results in the understandability of speech and normalcy of diet of the PSS-HN, than the ALTF (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: FRFF had the advantage of oral functions, such as chewing, speech and swallowing, over the ALTF for reconstruction of defect of half of the tongue. These results may provide useful information for surgeons to select a suitable free flap for tongue reconstruction.