Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2020
Comparison of Removable Rigid Dressing and Elastic Bandage for Residual Limb Maturation in Transtibial Amputees: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koonalinthip Nantawan, Sukthongsa Aungsumalin, Janchai Siriporn
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a removable rigid dressing (RRD) on the time to residual limb maturation compared with elastic bandage (EB) in transtibial amputees.
DESIGN: Experimental single-blinded (assessor-blinded) randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Transtibial amputees (N=25) with immature residual limb.
INTERVENTION: Participants were allocated to use RRD or EB to achieve residual limb maturation, and all participants in both groups were trained with the same preprosthetic program.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time to residual limb maturation, patient satisfaction, and complications were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Median time to residual limb maturation was significantly lower in the RRD group (median, 28d [interquartile range, 17-51d]) than in the EB group (median, 54d [interquartile range, 30-77d]; P=.020). After accounting for time since amputation, maturation time remained significantly lower in the RRD group (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.08-10.20; P=.036). There was no significant difference in complications or patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: In postoperative management of transtibial amputation, the use of RRD had a significantly shorter period to residual limb maturation when compared with the EB group.
DESIGN: Experimental single-blinded (assessor-blinded) randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Transtibial amputees (N=25) with immature residual limb.
INTERVENTION: Participants were allocated to use RRD or EB to achieve residual limb maturation, and all participants in both groups were trained with the same preprosthetic program.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time to residual limb maturation, patient satisfaction, and complications were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Median time to residual limb maturation was significantly lower in the RRD group (median, 28d [interquartile range, 17-51d]) than in the EB group (median, 54d [interquartile range, 30-77d]; P=.020). After accounting for time since amputation, maturation time remained significantly lower in the RRD group (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.08-10.20; P=.036). There was no significant difference in complications or patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: In postoperative management of transtibial amputation, the use of RRD had a significantly shorter period to residual limb maturation when compared with the EB group.