[The treatment of osteodystrophy in dialyzed uremic patients: results of the first Sardinian audit].

BACKGROUND

Hyperphosphatemia in the uremic patient undergoing dialysis causes and makes the secondary hyperpharatyroidism progress. Nowadays it has a very important role in predicting mortality. The aim of the study was to assess by "Audit" to analyse adequacy of the Sardinian dialytic patients with reference to the optimal objective of the national and international guidelines.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The questionnaire of the audit was composed of 11 questions about the percentage distribution of: calcium in the dialysate, values of phosphoremia), Ca x P product, patients treated with vitamin D taking one or more phosphate binders, average dose, spKt/V > or = 1.2, serum aluminium, parathiroidectomy.

RESULTS

We examined 1274 dialysis patients (93% on hemodialysis and 7% in CAPD) in 26 dialytic centers in our region (age 63.8 anni +/- 32.4; dialytic age 5.15 +/- 5.06. Phosphorus ranges (mg/dL) P < 5.5: 61.3 +/- 23%; between 5.5 e 6.5: 28.2 +/- 17.7%; and P > 6.5: 10.4 +/- 7.7%; Ca x P (<60): 77.8% +/- 16.6%; between 60-70: 16.8 +/- 13.4%; > 70: 4.99 +/- 4.7%. The more prescribed dialysate calcium was 1.5 mmol/L in HD (58.8%) HF (60.6%), HDF (51.6%) and CAPD (5.6%). PTH levels were: 31.1% (<120); 29.5% (120-250); 21.1% (250-450); 8% (450-600); 10.3% (>600). Patients on vitamin D: os daily 23.04 +/- 28%; post-dialysis boluses: os 32.6 +/- 28, i.v. 10.6 +/- 9%; no therapy 32.7 +/- 22.7%. The percentage use of phosphorus binders: 48.5% calcium carbonate (2.9 g/d); 7.12% calcium acetate (1.34 g/d); 13.5% sevelamer (2.79 g/d); 10% total aluminium based (0.62 g/d). The aluminium is dosed in 11/26 dialysis units (32.3% of the population); 2.3% +/- 0.9% of patients having Aluminium > 30 mcg/L. The dialytic patients have a Kt/V > or = 1.2: 80.1 +/- 19%. Parathyroidectomy incidences 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show good control of the average phosporous, there is a worrying percentage of patients with PTH values compatible with hypodynamic bone condition, lower and therefore safer calcium levels in the dialysate, poor aluminium control and low incidence of parathyroidectomy. In our experience the audit is a good way to verify and to correct the therapeutic choice in uremic osteodistrophy.