MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3928/23258160-20260512-01

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2026

Trends in the Initial Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United States.

Zhang Charles, Ersan Sinan, Sosa-Lockward Joaquin A, Aldred Molly P, Hua Hong-Uyen, Berrocal Audina M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize trends in choice of initial therapy for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the United States.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional time-series analysis on infants diagnosed with ROP categorized by initial treatment modality (laser photocoagulation/cryotherapy or intravitreal injection). TriNetX was used for data collection, and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to evaluate changes in the proportion of treatment modalities and agent usage over time.

RESULTS

A total of 2,050 infants met inclusion criteria. The proportion of infants treated with laser/cryotherapy decreased from 100% to 62.7% (P < .0001). Bevacizumab decreased from 100% of all intravitreal injections to 76.7% (P < .0001). Aflibercept use increased from 0% to 18.8% (P < .0001). White infants were more likely to be treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF than Black or Hispanic infants (P = .0061).

CONCLUSION

The rates of anti-VEGF for initial treatment have been rising over the years; however, laser photocoagulation remains the most common treatment for ROP in the United States.

Для цитирования: Zhang Charles, Ersan Sinan, Sosa-Lockward Joaquin A, Aldred Molly P, Hua Hong-Uyen, Berrocal Audina M. Trends in the Initial Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United States.. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2026. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20260512-01.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.