Computers in biology and medicine · 2024
Simplification strategies for a patient-specific CFD model of particle transport during liver radioembolization.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bomberna Tim, Maleux Geert, Debbaut Charlotte
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patient-specific 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been used previously to identify the impact of injection parameters (e.g. injection location, velocity, etc.) on the particle distribution and the tumor dose during transarterial injection of radioactive microspheres for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, these simulations are computationally costly, so we aim to evaluate whether these can be reliably simplified.
METHODS: We identified and applied five simplification strategies (i.e. truncation, steady flow modelling, moderate and severe grid coarsening, and reducing the number of cardiac cycles) to a patient-specific CFD setup. Subsequently, we evaluated whether these strategies can be used to (1) accurately predict the CFD output (i.e. particle distribution and tumor dose) and (2) quantify the sensitivity of the model output to a specific injection parameter (injection flow rate).
RESULTS: For both accuracy and sensitivity purposes, moderate grid coarsening is the most reliable simplification strategy, allowing to predict the tumor dose with only a maximal deviation of 1.4 %, and a similar sensitivity (deviation of 0.7 %). The steady strategy performs the worst, with a maximal deviation in the tumor dose of 20 % and a difference in sensitivity of 10 %.
CONCLUSION: The patient-specific 3D CFD simulations of this study can be reliably simplified by coarsening the grid, decreasing the computational time by roughly 45 %, which works especially well for sensitivity studies.
METHODS: We identified and applied five simplification strategies (i.e. truncation, steady flow modelling, moderate and severe grid coarsening, and reducing the number of cardiac cycles) to a patient-specific CFD setup. Subsequently, we evaluated whether these strategies can be used to (1) accurately predict the CFD output (i.e. particle distribution and tumor dose) and (2) quantify the sensitivity of the model output to a specific injection parameter (injection flow rate).
RESULTS: For both accuracy and sensitivity purposes, moderate grid coarsening is the most reliable simplification strategy, allowing to predict the tumor dose with only a maximal deviation of 1.4 %, and a similar sensitivity (deviation of 0.7 %). The steady strategy performs the worst, with a maximal deviation in the tumor dose of 20 % and a difference in sensitivity of 10 %.
CONCLUSION: The patient-specific 3D CFD simulations of this study can be reliably simplified by coarsening the grid, decreasing the computational time by roughly 45 %, which works especially well for sensitivity studies.