MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.291

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of Saudi medicine · 2019

Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism.

Al Juraibah Fahad, Alothaim Ali, Al Eyaid Wafa, AlMutair Angham Nasser

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using cord blood or heel-stick samples is considered essential for the prevention of long-term complications CH, which include intellectual disability and slow growth.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the sensitivity and specificity of cord blood and heel-stick samples for determining thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels for the detection of CH.

DESIGN

Comparative diagnostic accuracy.

SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The study included all infants who were delivered during the period from May 2011 to May 2013. As part of routine newborn screening, both cord blood and heel-stick samples were collected from each newborn for CH screening by measuring TSH levels. A cord TSH level was considered positive if the concentration of TSH was more than 60 mIU/L and negative if less than 30 mIU/L. Any cord TSH level between 30-60 mIU/L was considered borderline, and free T4 was measured from the same cord sample. The result was considered positive if the free T4 level was below 9 pmol/L. Heel-stick TSH levels more than 20 µU/L were considered positive. All newborns with positive results were recalled and a peripheral venous sample was taken for TSH and free T4 for confirmation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values and recall rates.

SAMPLE SIZE: 17 729 screened babies.

RESULTS

Of 17 729 neonates screened, 7 were diagnosed as having primary CH. All confirmed cases were detected by both cord and heel-stick TSH levels: 88 cord results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.6%, with a recall rate of 0.04%) and 305 heel-stick results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.3%, with a recall rate of 1.68%).

CONCLUSION

Both cord and heel-stick TSH testing detected all cases of CH. Cord testing was superior to heel-stick testing as the recall rate was lower. We think cord TSH testing is preferable when heel-stick is difficult or early discharge is the practice.

LIMITATIONS: Retrospective; the timing of newborn screening for TSH sampling was premature.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Для цитирования: Al Juraibah Fahad, Alothaim Ali, Al Eyaid Wafa, AlMutair Angham Nasser. Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism.. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.291.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.