MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.11.008

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2005

The assessment of urinary function following extended lymph node dissection for colorectal cancer.

Cöl C, Hasdemir O, Yalcin E, Guzel H, Tunc G, Bilgen K, Kucukpinar T

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: The aim of the current study is to demonstrate whether the effects of extended systematic lymph-node dissection (ESLND) on urinary dysfunctions differ from those of curative radical surgery (CRS) only for rectal cancer.

METHODS

We present data about our patients who underwent rectal resection for rectal cancer over 5 years. One hundred and seventy patients with rectal cancer were reviewed with respect to surgical procedures and post-operative urinary problems.

RESULTS

We performed CRS on 146 patients and CRS+ESLND on 24 patients, and analysed the incidence of post-operative urinary dysfunction in both groups. Urinary incontinence rates were 39 and 58%, urinary retention rates were 4 and 16%, for the patients from CRS group and CRS+ESLND group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the addition of ESLND to CRS does not increase the frequency of post-operative urinary dysfunction, apart from an increased risk of urinary retention.

Для цитирования: Cöl C, Hasdemir O, Yalcin E, Guzel H, Tunc G, Bilgen K, Kucukpinar T. The assessment of urinary function following extended lymph node dissection for colorectal cancer.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.11.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.