ASSESSMENT OF A LANCET-AND-SWAB BLOOD SAMPLING TECHNIQUE FOR SURVEILLANCE OF ELEPHANT ENDOTHELIOTROPIC HERPESVIRUS INFECTION.
Аннотация
Lancing a finger elicits minimal pain in humans and is applied routinely to obtain small volumes of blood for clinical diagnostics. A modified lancet bleeding method and several blood sampling matrices were evaluated in this study for the purpose of routine elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus (EEHV) surveillance in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). The procedure enabled weekly sampling from elephants as young as 9 mo of age. The blood sampling matrices were evaluated for their sensitivity measuring β-actin, tumor necrosis factor α, and/or EEHV-1 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays. Foam and flocked swabs produced significantly (P < 0.05) lower quantitation cycles, ie, increased analytical sensitivity, than filter papers, Whatman® FTA cards, or conventional cotton-tipped swabs. The two swab types also demonstrated comparable analytical sensitivity to that of a similar volume of EDTA whole blood for the detection of EEHV-1 DNA. This lancet-and-swab technique proved satisfactory for the detection of EEHV-1 viremia in two Asian elephant calves, and in one instance viremia could be detected 5 days prior to the development of clinical signs. Low blood yield from the lancet application may reduce sensitivity and compromise early detection of viremia. Therefore, standard venipuncture remains the recommended blood sampling method, and training for consistent and regular vein access should continue to be the priority for collections holding elephants. However, if appropriate measures are taken to collect an optimum blood volume, this lancet-and-swab technique offers a suitable alternative for EEHV surveillance in situations where venipuncture may not be practical.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.