MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0310057x0002800308

Медицинская библиотека · Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2000

Anaesthesia and fatigue: an analysis of the first 10 years of the Australian Incident Monitoring Study 1987-1997.

Morris G P, Morris R W

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) database of the Australian Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) was reviewed from its inception in April 1987 to October 1997. A total of 5600 AIMS reports were lodged in that period. Reports in which fatigue was listed as a Factor Contributing to Incident were examined. This occurred in 152 reports, or 2.7% of all reports. Confidence interval analysis suggested that fatigue was associated with various concurrently reported factors. These included pharmacological incidents (especially syringe swaps) and time of day. Other factors significantly associated with fatigue reports were haste, distraction, inattention and failure to check equipment. Relieving anaesthetists and healthy patients were reported more often as factors minimizing incidents. Anaesthetists reporting fatigue more often reported incidents during induction. These data suggest that fatigue alleviation strategies and equipment checking routines, improved workplace design (including drug ampoule and syringe labelling protocols) and regulation of working hours will facilitate minimization of fatigue-related incidents. Definitive prospective studies might be most usefully targeted at these and related interventions.

Для цитирования: Morris G P, Morris R W. Anaesthesia and fatigue: an analysis of the first 10 years of the Australian Incident Monitoring Study 1987-1997.. Anaesthesia and intensive care. 2000. DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0002800308.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.