MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01141.x

Медицинская библиотека · Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2009

The significance of second lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Argyriou A A, Karanasios P, Makridou A, Makris N

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To assess the significance of the second lumbrical-interosseous latency (2LI-DML) comparison in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We examined 150 consecutive hands of patients referred with suspected CTS, using the 2LI-DML test and other standard measures of median nerve function. Correlations of the 2LI-DML test with standard tests were computed.

RESULTS

Hundred and four hands were electrophysiologically confirmed to have CTS. The 2LI-DML test was abnormal in 99/104 (95.2%) hands with CTS with a mean value of 1.54 +/- 1.12 ms. Among the other measures, the orthodromic median-ulnar palmar velocity comparison was the most frequently abnormal test (95/104 hands, 91.3%), followed by the double-peak morphology of orthodromic sensory action potential from digit 4 (94/104, 90.4%). The 2LI-DML test significantly correlated, either positively or negatively, with all other standard tests.

CONCLUSION

The 2LI-DML comparison is highly sensitive in diagnosing CTS, even in mild cases in which standard tests fail to detect abnormalities.

Для цитирования: Argyriou A A, Karanasios P, Makridou A, Makris N. The significance of second lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01141.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.