MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2006-958702

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery · 2007

Comparison of experimental microvascular end-to-end anastomosis via VCS-Clips versus conventional suture technique in an animal model.

Klöppel M, Tudor C, Kovacs L, Papadopulos N A, Höhnke C, Himsl I, Hoang N T, Biemer E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In this experimental study on 96 CD rats, microvascular end-to-end anastomoses created via suture or alternatively by means of a VCS-Clip-Application-System, were compared. The aorta abdominalis of the animals, with a diameter of 1.5 +/- 0.2 mm, was experimentally dissected, and the free ends of the vessel then anastomosed. The results were evaluated using sonography, microangiography, histologic examination, and vascular imprints. Postoperative examination was carried out after 1, 3, 7, 14, or 30 days. Major advantages of the VCS-Clip technique over suturing were that it was easy to learn, significantly faster to perform (execution of anastomosis 10.9 +/- 2.6 min versus 19.4 +/- 5.0 min), and produced significantly more favorable histologic results in terms of less inflammatory response, foreign body reaction, necrosis of the tunica media, hyperplasia of the intima, and thrombosis of the vessel lumen. The main disadvantage of the clip technique was a significantly higher rate of stenoses (15.8 +/- 6.0 versus 4.1 +/- 6.6 percent).

Для цитирования: Klöppel M, Tudor C, Kovacs L, Papadopulos N A, Höhnke C, Himsl I, Hoang N T, Biemer E. Comparison of experimental microvascular end-to-end anastomosis via VCS-Clips versus conventional suture technique in an animal model.. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-958702.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.