Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2005
Power and knowledge in psychiatry and the troubling case of Dr Osheroff.
БиографияКлинический случайИсторическая статьяСтатьяLegal CaseНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robertson Michael
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To consider the state of knowledge in psychiatry with reference to the 'Osheroff debate' about the treatment of depression.
METHOD: A review of the key philosophical issues regarding the nature of knowledge applied to the Osheroff case.
RESULTS: There is an apparent dichotomy between knowledge derived from a reductionist scientific method, as manifest in evidence-based medicine, and that of a narrative form of knowledge derived from clinical experience. The Focauldian notion of knowledge/power and knowledge as discourse suggests that scientific knowledge dominates over narrative knowledge in psychiatry. The implication of this applied to the Osheroff case is the potential annihilation of all forms of knowledge other than science.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge in psychiatry is a pluralist, rather than singularly scientific enterprise. In the Osheroff case, the potential for scientific knowledge to abolish other forms of knowledge posed a serious threat of weakening the profession. In the light of the current debate about best practice, there is a need for reconsideration of the implications of Osheroff.
METHOD: A review of the key philosophical issues regarding the nature of knowledge applied to the Osheroff case.
RESULTS: There is an apparent dichotomy between knowledge derived from a reductionist scientific method, as manifest in evidence-based medicine, and that of a narrative form of knowledge derived from clinical experience. The Focauldian notion of knowledge/power and knowledge as discourse suggests that scientific knowledge dominates over narrative knowledge in psychiatry. The implication of this applied to the Osheroff case is the potential annihilation of all forms of knowledge other than science.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge in psychiatry is a pluralist, rather than singularly scientific enterprise. In the Osheroff case, the potential for scientific knowledge to abolish other forms of knowledge posed a serious threat of weakening the profession. In the light of the current debate about best practice, there is a need for reconsideration of the implications of Osheroff.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Antidepressive Agents, TricyclicAnxietyAttitudeCombined Modality TherapyCountertransferenceMajor Depressive DisorderEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansInterpersonal RelationsKnowledgeMarriageNarcissismPatient CompliancePatient RightsPhilosophyPower, PsychologicalPsychiatryPsychoanalytic TherapyPsychomotor AgitationPsychotherapyUnited States