Eye (London, England) · 2005
Risk management strategies following analysis of cataract negligence claims.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bhan A, Dave D, Vernon S A, Bhan K, Bhargava J, Goodwin H, Medical Defence Union, Medical Protection Society, Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Clinical governance and risk management is very important in today's clinical practice. Cataract surgery is one of the most common procedures performed in the NHS, with around 200,000 operations per year. In order to help minimise the frequency of negligence claims, we performed a collaborative study to analyse claims relating to cataract surgery, dealt with by the defence organisations of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All claims dealt with by the Medical Defence Union, the Medical Protection Society, and the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland from January 1990 to December 1999, were analysed by three ophthalmologists with at least 5 years' speciality experience. Recurrent themes were identified and claims were grouped by major causative factor. The findings were discussed by a panel compromising the authors in conjunction with the defence unions and risk management strategies were designed.
RESULTS: There were 96 claims within the 10- year period analysed. Of these, the largest group (52) pertained to claims that related to accepted complications of cataract surgery. The remainder comprised two groups: 'Medical Errors' (anaesthetic, surgeon, and biometry) and 'Other Claims' comprising subjective complaints, pain and poor visual outcome. A total of 16 claims had been settled by May 2002, 45 are ongoing and 35 have closed without settlement.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of claims pertained to well-recognised complications of cataract surgery. If these risks are adequately explained to the patient before surgery and if the care provided reaches a standard acceptable to a responsible body of professional opinion, all such claims should be defensible. Good visual outcome does not protect against litigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All claims dealt with by the Medical Defence Union, the Medical Protection Society, and the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland from January 1990 to December 1999, were analysed by three ophthalmologists with at least 5 years' speciality experience. Recurrent themes were identified and claims were grouped by major causative factor. The findings were discussed by a panel compromising the authors in conjunction with the defence unions and risk management strategies were designed.
RESULTS: There were 96 claims within the 10- year period analysed. Of these, the largest group (52) pertained to claims that related to accepted complications of cataract surgery. The remainder comprised two groups: 'Medical Errors' (anaesthetic, surgeon, and biometry) and 'Other Claims' comprising subjective complaints, pain and poor visual outcome. A total of 16 claims had been settled by May 2002, 45 are ongoing and 35 have closed without settlement.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of claims pertained to well-recognised complications of cataract surgery. If these risks are adequately explained to the patient before surgery and if the care provided reaches a standard acceptable to a responsible body of professional opinion, all such claims should be defensible. Good visual outcome does not protect against litigation.